I'd love to test the 10-bit capable version to see how fast it is when converting to Proxies, because that is exactly my workflow in FCPX. I shoot exclusively in 10-bit HLG on my Panasonic GH5, so the free version of Resolve won't work for me. And did a quick test and plays well with the new FCPX proxy relinking. Hardly anything beats it for that purpose, and I love the proxy conversion, especially for h265. I've been a long time FCPX user and still love the software to this day, but I keep my eyes open as to what's trending or better, especially when updates to FCPX are slow in coming.Resolve will forever be my Swiss-army knife of converting though. I'd like to see some Resolve and FCPX feature comparisons to see if Resolve takes the crown when it comes to ease of use. A lot of folks rave about Adobe Premier's features, forgetting how dog slow it is on the Mac, and also forgetting that horrid subscription model. From what I understand, Resolve has surpassed FCPX in some areas when it comes to speed. I look forward to seeing a more comprehensive article that pits Resolve 17 against FCPX, giving special attention to performance. Resolve will forever be my Swiss-army knife of converting though. (Besides Premiere for the reasons stated) That said I almost exclusively work in Avid because of my job, but would love to use almost anything else! Hah. I'd like to play with it more as well, but what slows it down (like any other editor besides FCPX) is it being track based. I've been a long time FCPX user and still love the software to this day, but I keep my eyes open as to what's trending or better, especially when updates to FCPX are slow in coming.
0 kommentar(er)
